Compare and contrast the reviews you read this week. Discuss the criteria for evaluation that each reviewer uses. What criteria does Chris Harris use to evaluate a sports car (in the video)? What criteria does Peter Wells use to evaluate a restaurant? What about Nelson Ireson (in rebuttal to Chris Harris)? Do you think based on the reviews that the writers have been fair and/or unbiased in their reviews? How could these negative reviews be made more persuasive? How would you expand on the criteria? How could the authors expand on how they justify their arguments? You will write a review for the second essay. What are some elements of a well-written review that you would like to integrate into your paper?
spend time reflecting on suggestions for improvement given to you in the Peer Review last week and by your professor throughout the first few weeks of class. If you did not receive a peer review, work through the workshop questions on your own and develop a plan of improvement.You can also email the Virtual Writing Center if you want feedback on an entire essay. It takes some “turn-around time,” so you have to work ahead. Here are the instructions: https://www.cnm.edu/depts/tutoring/virtual-writing-center/checklist-for-submitting-paper-online I will also be sharing my thoughts with you on your draft by Friday. Finally, if you’d like to learn more about the art of revision, essentially “seeing again” your draft for the first time, please read through UNC-Chapel Hill’s discussion here: https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/revising-drafts/ Learning Outcomes: to analyze experience and memory for meaning and significance to develop public resonance in writing to practice the skills of narration including description, dialogue, and transition to focus and develop a thesis-driven essay to organize an essay to practice sentence clarity and variety Minimum Requirements: 550-800 words (with a 50 words leeway more or fewer words) MLA formatted identifiable and supportable thesis responds to the prompt Writing Prompt for the Personal Essay:
Remembering Who You Were For this paper, you will write an essay in which you select a particular memory of an event, experience, person, or place and use to explore how you came to be who you are. In and of themselves, memories are not important, nor do they teach us anything. We must, as thinkers and writers, examine our memories with curiosity and a sense of possibility in order to learn something new, understand the importance of a moment, and to decide who we will continue to become. Many disciplines (sociology, psychology, biology) require individuals to use memories to create new theories and to develop strategies for achieving particular goals. Although there is no “right way” to structure a piece of personal writing, you may want to consider the following as possible patterns of development for each kind of paper. Organizing a Personal Essay Draft an introduction that sets the scene and captures the interest of a reader. ↓ Present a complication or conflict that must be resolved in some way before the end of the story. This conflict can be between the author and self, between the author and others, or between the author and his or her environment. It could be a change, discovery, or challenge. ↓
Explore the complication and conflict in rich, vivid language in a way that allows the reader to understand that there is a central theme or question that may or may not be stated explicitly but is significant. ↓ Conclude with the resolution of the conflict (even if the resolution itself is ambivalent or ambiguous). Include the understanding or revelation that presents the moment of growth, transformation, or clarity for the author.