For this assignment, you are to objectively analyze the issue of extreme/outrageous conduct within our Robinhood hypothetical. This should include sections for the rule/law, brief conclusion, thorough analysis, and conclusion. Remember to use probability language and present arguments for BOTH sides.
Furthermore, La. C.C. art. 2315.6 is NOT the rule for this hypothetical. You should not be analyzing anything about the relationship between Dominique and his parents. The Lejeune case does NOT address IIED, it analyzes NIED. However, there is some language and analysis you can apply to our Robinhood hypothetical concerning the “severe emotional distress” element.
Give rule regarding of extreme/outrageous conduct
Previous assignment attached for reference..
Use the following 5 cases as resources:
|
Hairford v. CenturyTel Inc., 856 So. 2d 139 Lejeune v. Rayne Branch Hosp., 556 So. 2d 559 Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co., 765 So. 2d 1017 Norred v. Radisson Hotel Corp., 665 So. 2d 753 White v. Monsanto Co., 585 So. 2d 1205 |
