Study Review of Ethics
It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format.
All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.
Reference 2017 to present
Discussion Question/Prompt
Read the article by Aiken and associates https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/26/7/559
She has been exploring the topic of patient safety for a number of years and has been applying her research findings across international boundaries.
Consider your topic of interest and the purpose for exploring this topic. What outcomes would you like to see emerge from this?
How would you measure these outcomes?
Include in your discussion an analysis of how Aiken measured her selected outcomes.
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
