Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a  of the  in which the Court ruled that the  restricts prosecutors from using a person’s statements made in response to  in  custody as evidence at their  unless they can show that the person was informed of the right to consult with an  before and during questioning, and of the right against  before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them